Are Prophylactic Mastectomies Better Than Annual Screenings in Terms of Cost?

Posted on October 15, 2015

This is out of Mass General in the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Journal.  As I have said, breast cancer (or the fear of it) seems to be everywhere.  I have definitely seen the rise of prophylactic mastectomies, whether done on both sides (as in the case of someone with a strong family history or BRCA positive status), or on one side, when diagnosed with a cancer in the other breast.

So.  The question this team was looking at was: which costs more? and do you find hidden breast cancers?

doctor-piggy-bankIs it more cost effective to do a major surgery and remove the breasts prophylactically? Or is more cost effective to screen the breasts yearly? And how many times do the prophylactic mastectomies find a hidden cancer?

Study:

Findings:

I found this abstract fascinating.  Medicine is becoming more of a business to some in power, so analysis like this is important to allow us to be able to present choices to patients.  When I see women with a strong family history of breast cancer, or a personal history of breast cancer, I think the option of taking off a breast preventatively is important.  For some women, the constant worry –of the yearly mammogram, the waiting for biopsy results, the fear — incapacitates.