Protein rich plasma “PRP”- Does it help with facial rejuvenation? Journal time.

Posted on April 20, 2016

image3913This is a study out of Italy with Dr. Rigotti (for those in the know, he is a big guy in the fat grafting world).  There is lot of hype about stem cells and protein rich plasma (called PRP) both helping rejuvenate the skin. As you know if you read my blog at all, I am a huge fan of fat transfer and stem cells. I personally have seen the skin improvements, and there are good studies supporting the changes we see in the skin are real.  (Studies done with histology and biopsies, not the “yes, your skin looks prettier” but the “on this histology slide you can see the elastic content improved.”)

So.  Does PRP deserve the same hype?

This was a study to see if PRP can replace the regenerative effect of fat derived stem cells.  PRP is easier to obtain. See my prior blogs on the subject  PRP blogs.

This was in the Aesthetic Surgery Journal, March 2016.  The title is a doozy.  “Expanded Stem cells, Stromal Vascular Fraction, and Platelet Rich Plasma Enriched Fat: Comparing Results of Different Facial Rejuvenation Approaches in a Clinical Trial.”

Study:

Findings?

They conclude it did not have advantages for skin rejuvenation.  It may be good to add though in situations where you need new blood vessel formation, like in tissue ischemia (when it isn’t getting enough oxygen.) “Based on the results of this study, an agent that causes inflammation could be not indicated in a procedure utilized to obtain skin rejuvenation.”

So I get that PRP is trendy.  It is easy to harvest the blood and spin it.  It has a cool name — “the vampire facelift.”  But I rely on studies and science.  This study is a good one, and supports what I found when looking at PRP in the past.  PRP is NOT the same as fat transfer with stem cells.  It does not give the skin rejuvenation effect.  There may be some role for it, and as the authors conclude, more studies need to be done.